-
Aptera safety info and issues
I understand the body will be very strong and good in a crash. The windows may be made from glass or Polycarbonate. The side windows roll down half way.
If the car becomes stuck in water for any reason, will it sink or float?
If there is water pressure on the doors and you can’t smash a window because they are made from polycarbonate, how do we exit the vehicle? Water pressure will push the doors shut.
I guess being front heavy, the tail may be in the air. Can we get out the cargo door from inside the car?
- This discussion was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by
John Trotter. Reason: Expand title for clarity
- This discussion was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by
- 67 Replies
-
Aptera safety info and issues
updated 7 hours, 54 minutes ago 45 Members · 67 Replies -
I’d go for the rear hatch.
-
The doors open up not out like conventional car doors. Also, if you keep the glass tool that allows you to break your auto glass in an emergency, (Also comes with a blade to cut your seat belt if it is struck) you should be OK either breaking the windshield or the hatch if not full solar. Not sure how that would work with the hatch covered by solar cells.
I am not worried about getting out of the vehicle in a flood. Probability that I would be in a flood with an Aptera is pretty slim
-
I do worry about this, since several drowning deaths occur every year on highway 55 along the N Fork of the Payette River, the main road to my town. Cars go into the class 5 rapids, end of story.My SAR unit trains for just that scenario.
Opening the back hatch from the inside could be the only way out. But if that hatch is facing upstream, no dice. And what about if the car is inverted in water?
I hope the Aptera engineers can think through answers to these bad outcomes.
-
Some cars simply float better than others. The stories of VW Beetles floating in ponds was common 40-50 years ago.
Now anything can happen in a flash flood. A car could be trapped in a culvert or under a fallen tree. But since this kind of accident is prominent in some parts, apparently, ask yourself are VW Beetles under or over represented as the vehicle of victims.
As far as the ‘fly off a bridge scenario,’ your first jolt hitting the water will by definition be more like a spear entering the water than a brick. Apter’s .13 Cd compares not to pretty slick cars with .20 -.29 cd but those with .30 to .40+ are true bricks and are in the majority.
The Aptera is also light and roughly egg shaped with an air-bubble on top and a heavy battery under the seats. Even if you fell off a tall bridge into a bay, the fact that the pressure is being spread pretty evenly over the entire composite monocoque (think motorcycle helmet) body suggests it is that spear and it will right itsself as it bobs to the top.
That would be my expectation although there are definitely limits. I think it is going to be like old Aptera’s six-times roof strength advantage except even better.
What we won’t know, until Aptera is in production and accidents happen, whether it will sink if you’re 20 lbs over maximum weight or if you find yourself in a pond, you ought not open the door and because with only one passenger, if the driver is over 300 lbs, it will capsize.
PS: I think Hollywood will have fun with this feature because, in comparison to other cars, nothing is built like this. That means it can do things other car’s can’t.
-
Some of this may be addressed by the Lordstown Endurance during their testing.
-
I hear you but in the end… an autocycle is registered as a motorcycle and does not have to meet a car crash test. But YES Aptera plans to crash test????
-
I understand that Aptera is exempt from crash tests but NO ONE wants a reputation as a death trap for first responders.
Do know that the composite monocoque design of the Aptera cabin and its implications for strength and safety is one of the reasons I’m all in with this project.
Besides, somewhere in the scheme of things, I think safety is close to a first principle.
-
-
There is zero chance that they haven’t thought of this and figured out a solution. Electrocuting someone after a crash would put them out of business, not just from the lawsuit but from the publicity.
-
Certainly safety is a concern for any prospective vehicle buyer.
It is true that Aptera is most commonly categorized as an autocycle and exempt from auto safety testing standards. but, Aptera has repeatedly said that they will test to full auto safety standards. That means as Joshua Rosen has said in his post, that there is zero chance that Aptera engineers are not acutely aware of safety considerations as they engineer the vehicle. I suspect, since they have made the testing claim public, that they will over engineer safety (Not a bad thing)
Beta engineering is complete and build is in progress. Following Beta there well be two additional versions of Aptera before it goes to “Government testing”
The jury will be “In” when the government testing results are made public. I am confident that those results will put some ICE vehicle safety ratings to shame.
-
Good questions, George!
Of some 40 global organizations, the best known in the US are:
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and;
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
<div>
The full list is at: https://independentmotors.net/crash-test/
</div>
Of most interest to the Aptera community, NHTSA does rollover and roof crush resistance testing, and the dreaded “moose avoidance” test. IIHS does the frontal and offset crash tests that you specifically mention.
As for front wheel separation concerns, there are three pretty robust copper cables attached to the in-wheel motors that may retain the wheel’s attachment to the body. In that sense, they are somewhat similar to Formula 1’s kevlar wheel retention requirement that keeps the wheels attached to a crashing car.
In regards to your concerns about power disconnects, as far back as 2002, MINI Coopers had a power disablement system that triggered when the car experienced a very strong jolt. I know because a friend I was following suddenly pulled off to the side of the road and I stopped to help. He had hit the mother-of-all-potholes. We couldn’t figure out what happened so he called MINI who told him where the reset mechanism was. I don’t know if that’s a regulatory requirement here, but if so, I suspect there’s one or more vehicle subsystems supplier that could provide them to Aptera.
-
So the Aptera shell is very strong and can withstand a great deal. But, modern safety design is largely dependent on crumple zones to absorb impact while leaving the cab protected. Won’t the rigidity of the Aptera shell lead to worsened risk for transmission of crash forces to the passengers? This is what happened with the heavy rigid vehicles from the 1940-to-1960s. Just wanted to make sure that the driver and passenger don’t have their brains turned to mush by a full-force impact.
-
Thank you for expressing your concern. We all should be concerned about the safety of the vehicles we drive
Although Aptera is classified as an autocycle/motor cycle, Aptera is engineered for and will test against full government automobile safety standards to include crash testing. I believe, because of their meticulous engineering, they will outperform many ICE autos in this critical area. I would not be surprised to see five stars.
Additionally, Aptera has the traditional crumple zone design from the firewall forward.
-
This is from the Aptera FAQ under the title “what are the ramifications of minor body damage”. It also speaks to major body damage and structural safety.
The front and rear sections are designed to be replaceable if damaged. Both are made of impact-resistant plastic, as are the wheel covers. They are also both foam filled to help in a higher speed incident. The front nose cone along with our subframe, in particular, are designed to crumple against our angled firewall and extend an impact sequence to the benefit of our passenger safety cell.
-
Hi Paul, I agree that I’ve heard a lot about the shell strength but not crash testing. I was surprised to learn that enclosed 3-wheeled autocycles do not require a helmet. I understand that the vehicle will have driver and passenger airbags along with side airbags. There is a fan-made (or maybe ambassador) video on youtube showing a crash simulation, but I have not seen these images elsewhere. They look like official renderings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SbjCuhC2Sw
-
They have state both the front and rear have crumple zones and the front wheels also act as a crumple zone. This was in one of their video Q&A sessions. The front is metal frame with a composite cover.
-
Here in the Mid-Atlantic part of the USA we have too many deer. And we occasionally hit one (I’ve done that).
What happens to an Aptera vehicle if it hits a deer?
-
Get safety pilot (level 2 autonomy) for automatic breaking and hope you don’t hit it. The shell can take minor impacts without damage but if you hit it at more than 10mph it would be very tricky to repair (basically replace major body pieces)
-
Nose cone is plastic – Crumplezone structure behind that – then the much stronger passenger cell. The front suspension, pants, nose, etc are all easily replaceable in a few hours. The body itself is built like a boat – hard fiberglass shell. You can’t ding it with a sledgehammer. So, hitting it with a deer probably isn’t going to total the body, although you might have to replace the windshield and various front end components. In terms of simplicity Apterae have a fraction of the parts of a traditional automobile, and they are a lot more resilient to impact and easier to replace quickly with wrenches. Additionally, since there isn’t a dirty engine everything is clean and easy to work on.
-
As a former Tesla electrical engineer and an ex solar car engineer, I can assure everyone that this won’t be a problem.
EVs have a wire in the high voltage harness called HVIL – it stands for High Voltage Interlock Loop. It’s connected between the battery management system and all consumers of the HV battery (inverters, heaters, HVAC, etc) and also serves as the first responder emergency power cutoff (the “cut here in event of crash” wire in every EV).
It’s a communications wire where the consumers of HV constantly sends a “keep alive” signal to the battery (usually at 1kHz or more). In the event of a crash where the HV harness is damaged (or when the onboard crash detector detects a crash), the devices connected to the battery management system HVIL line will simply stop sending the “keep alive” signal and the battery will simply shut off (either by contactor opening or by blowing a pyrotechnic fuse)
I can confidently promise that people won’t be electrocuted by having a wheel shear off!
-
Coming from a automotive and racing background, safety wise I would like to see the front hubs secured with cables to the body frame. Very scary watching a wheel go flying into a crowd.
-
If someone hits you in an aptera they would have hit you no matter what you were driving. My concern is that aptera will be too “visible” and be the cause of a crash due to people starring at it while on the highway. Here is a comparison between aptera and a tesla, a motorcycle is tiny in comparison.
-
Will the Aptera have ABS?
-
According to the FAQ spreadsheet, “We have torque control on all wheels along with ABS. This will give us great stability control and tuneability not seen on any ICE vehicles.”
-
The doors open upward which is good space saving idea. With Shape being like a bird, when rolled upside down how can one open the doors? Granted it’s not easy to topple it unless it’s a highway truck or something.
-
Just some notions…
Would it be any different than a conventional car roll over? I.e Not all doors could be compromised
Not all doors and or hatch need to open fully?
Jaws Of Life might be used for egress for a really bad scenario in any vehicle crash..
